Tip: Do you play world of warcraft? Then you probably want to buy cheap wow gold from us!

Enter a query


Just enter a word (aka: "who searched for what"). Enter #number to go to a specific user.

- Random user (>3)

Search results

Results for "www craigslist com com", showing result 141 to 160 of 10000 search terms. Search took 0.16 seconds.

  1. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-15 22:17:04 (found http://philadelphia.craigslist.org)
  2. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-16 21:56:47
  3. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-21 19:55:50 (found http://philadelphia.craigslist.org)
  4. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-21 19:55:50 (found http://philadelphia.craigslist.org)
  5. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-22 20:02:40 (found http://www.craigslist.org)
  6. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-22 20:02:40 (found http://www.craigslist.org)
  7. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-24 20:56:57 (found http://www.craigslist.com)
  8. User 108762 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-24 20:56:57 (found http://www.craigslist.com)
  9. User 139875 searched for "craigslist san diego" [!] at 2006-05-09 21:25:21 (found http://sandiego.craigslist.org)
  10. User 139875 searched for "san diego craigslist" [!] at 2006-05-24 18:58:13 (found http://sandiego.craigslist.org)

    11. Sponsored listings

  11. User 167287 searched for "www.craigslist.com" [!] at 2006-03-16 23:48:59
  12. User 167287 searched for "www.craigslist.com" [!] at 2006-03-16 23:49:00
  13. User 167287 searched for "www.craigslist.com" [!] at 2006-03-29 12:33:53
  14. User 191655 searched for "craigslist" [!] at 2006-04-13 21:05:25
Search Term:

This searchable database contains 36389569 searches made by AOL users from 01 March, 2006 - 31 May, 2006. The data was released under a non-commercial research license by AOL. The associated README file contains further information about what data was provided. If you find any data that actually makes it possible to identify a user, please let us know using the [!]-function and we'll remove those references.