Tip: Do you play world of warcraft? Then you probably want to buy cheap wow gold from us!

Enter a query


Just enter a word (aka: "who searched for what"). Enter #number to go to a specific user.

- Random user (>3)

Search results

Results for "snopes com", showing result 1501 to 1512 of 1513 search terms. Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:23:19 (found http://www.snopes.com)
  2. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:24:43
  3. User 5346236 searched for "snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:29:01 (found http://www.snopes.com)
  4. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:29:18
  5. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:30:43 (found http://www.faqs.org)
  6. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:32:32 (found http://www.snopes.com)
  7. User 5346236 searched for "www.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-03-07 21:32:43
  8. User 5369316 searched for "snopes" [!] at 2006-05-09 22:20:12 (found http://msgboard.snopes.com)
  9. User 5969937 searched for "ww.snopes.com" [!] at 2006-05-19 15:55:09
  10. User 5969937 searched for "ww.snopes.comgirls dying poem" [!] at 2006-05-19 15:58:07

    11. Sponsored listings

  11. User 5969937 searched for "www.snopes.comgirls dying poem" [!] at 2006-05-19 15:58:20
  12. User 5969937 searched for "www.snopes.comgirls dying poemdennis shields" [!] at 2006-05-19 15:58:55
  13. User 6232644 searched for "www.snopes.comm" [!] at 2006-03-03 12:06:41
  1. << Prev.
  2. 57
  3. 58
  4. 59
  5. 60
  6. 61
  7. 62
  8. 63
  9. 64
  10. 65
  11. 66
  12. 67
  13. 68
  14. 69
  15. 70
  16. 71
  17. 72
  18. 73
  19. 74
  20. 75
  21. 76
  22. Next >>
Search Term:

This searchable database contains 36389569 searches made by AOL users from 01 March, 2006 - 31 May, 2006. The data was released under a non-commercial research license by AOL. The associated README file contains further information about what data was provided. If you find any data that actually makes it possible to identify a user, please let us know using the [!]-function and we'll remove those references.