Tip: Do you play world of warcraft? Then you probably want to buy cheap wow gold from us!

Enter a query


Just enter a word (aka: "who searched for what"). Enter #number to go to a specific user.

- Random user (>3)

Search results

Results for "shit scat", showing result 1 to 12 of 13 search terms. Search took 0.05 seconds.

  1. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:36:55 (found http://www.scatlovers.com)
  2. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://www.stillwerise.org)
  3. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://www.rhynecyder.com)
  4. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://www.stillwerise.org)
  5. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://www.canfli.org)
  6. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu)
  7. User 609208 searched for "shit scat" [!] at 2006-04-03 22:38:29 (found http://www.buffaloshows.org)
  8. User 13392579 searched for "scat shit play 28" [!] at 2006-03-11 20:20:50
  9. User 6228254 searched for "long for shit parties or scat parties" [!] at 2006-03-03 17:47:21 (found http://www.winternet.com)
  10. User 6228254 searched for "long for shit parties or scat parties" [!] at 2006-03-03 17:47:21 (found http://www.winternet.com)

    11. Sponsored listings

  11. User 6228254 searched for "long for shit parties or scat parties" [!] at 2006-03-03 18:04:46
  12. User 6228254 searched for "long for shit parties or scat parties" [!] at 2006-03-03 18:06:29
  13. User 6228254 searched for "long for shit parties or scat parties" [!] at 2006-03-03 18:07:44
  1. << Prev.
  2. 1
  3. Next >>
Search Term:

This searchable database contains 36389569 searches made by AOL users from 01 March, 2006 - 31 May, 2006. The data was released under a non-commercial research license by AOL. The associated README file contains further information about what data was provided. If you find any data that actually makes it possible to identify a user, please let us know using the [!]-function and we'll remove those references.