Tip: Need powerleveling in wow? Or do you just want to buy wow gold? Come to us!

Enter a query


Just enter a word (aka: "who searched for what"). Enter #number to go to a specific user.

- Random user (>3)

Search results

Results for "golf vacations", showing result 1 to 12 of 13 search terms. Search took 0.26 seconds.

  1. User 244574 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-03-01 14:53:58
  2. User 809509 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 01:14:15 (found http://www.travelgolf.com)
  3. User 809509 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 01:14:15 (found http://www.golfzoo.com)
  4. User 2185174 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-05-14 22:27:31 (found http://www.resort-golf.com)
  5. User 6399541 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-03-17 22:43:06
  6. User 7238538 searched for "golf vacations connecticut" [!] at 2006-04-24 23:09:20 (found http://www.neteetimes.com)
  7. User 3031246 searched for "hawaii golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 18:17:18 (found http://www.hawaiigolfdeals.com)
  8. User 3031246 searched for "hawaii golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 18:17:18 (found http://www.princeresortshawaii.com)
  9. User 3031246 searched for "hawaii golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 18:17:18 (found http://www.worldgolf.com)
  10. User 3031246 searched for "hawaii golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-25 18:17:18 (found http://www.princeresortshawaii.com)
  11. Sponsored listings

  12. User 7761476 searched for "golf vacations" [!] at 2006-04-12 22:07:12
  13. User 7761476 searched for "golf vacations maine" [!] at 2006-04-12 23:03:40 (found http://www.samosetresort.com)
  14. User 13764281 searched for "hilton head golf vacations" [!] at 2006-05-03 10:10:26
  1. << Prev.
  2. 1
  3. Next >>
Search Term:

This searchable database contains 36389569 searches made by AOL users from 01 March, 2006 - 31 May, 2006. The data was released under a non-commercial research license by AOL. The associated README file contains further information about what data was provided. If you find any data that actually makes it possible to identify a user, please let us know using the [!]-function and we'll remove those references.